Glenfield
Technical Library
Pre-emptive
Bids

Last
Updated on 17th April 2012
|
Preemptive bids are intended to make life difficult for
opponents by taking up lots of bidding space. |
|
|
ª J © Q94 ¨ KJT9872 § 84 |
They
are typically made on weak hands with little defence but a long suit. In traditional Acol opening bids of three or four of a
suit are pre-emptive based on a seven card suit. This example comes from the National Masters Pairs on 1st March 2003
and is fairly typical. At game all
this is a reasonable opening bid of three diamonds. |
|
The modern style is to pre-empt more aggressively; often
on a six card suit. |
|
|
ª 3 © T4 ¨ JT95 § AKT932 |
Nick
Stevens set a challenge for Tim Glover and Peter Neville in the 2003
Gimson semi-final by opening three clubs on this selection in second
position at adverse vulnerability. |
|
In first or second position the pre-emptive bid can be a
double edged sword; causing more problems for partner than for opponents. |
|||
|
Board
9 Dealer
N EW
Vul |
North ª 43 © A32 ¨ 8 § AQ86543 |
|
This
example, from the match between Glenfield A and Leicester Bridge Centre B on 19th
March 2003, was a little too strong for a pre-empt in first
or second
position. At
our table John Glover opened three clubs.
Neither East or South has anything sensible to say over this and,
should West protect with three diamonds (if it is not conventional – some
players play three diamonds as Fishbein
or FILM, showing a hand that would have made a take
out double; allowing double to be made for penalties)
it is difficult to see East stopping short of game. Note
that the TNT
is 20 and the hands obey the law of
total tricks; both sides having ten tricks available in their best
fits. John made three clubs plus one
as did John Morrey and Lesley Neville’s opponents. Ken Skinner and Baerbel Sandhu bid and made four diamonds while
Dennis and Geoff were the only pair to achieve theoretical par; doubling
and defeating five diamonds by one trick. The
downside of opening three clubs on such a strong hand in first and second
position is that you might easily miss a game. Indeed four hearts is unbeatable. |
|
West ª QT65 © 75 ¨ A97653 § J |
|
East ª A2 © KT4 ¨ KQT42 § 972 |
|
|
|
South ª KJ987 © QJ986 ¨ J § KT |
|
|
|
It is also possible to use a double jump overcall as a
preempt. |
|
|
ª AQT9543 © 65 ¨ 52 § T2 |
Such
an overcall proved highly effective in the match between Blaby B and Glenfield A
on 18th December 2002. |
|
This hand is from the Pairs
League on 20th October 2011 – Commentary by Dick Pathan |
||||
|
|
5S by N –450 |
0 |
0 |
Whether you open the North hand or not, East should make life
difficult for the opponents by pre-empting
with 4D. South doubles for takeout, and West might apply even more pressure by bidding 5D (only 2 off). At our
table, Lucy (North) passed as dealer, East did open with 4D and I doubled,
but when West passed, Lucy bid 4NT (showing two places to play) over which
I bid 5H, which Lucy corrected to
5S. No swing in our match. |
|
Tim’s Statistics Imps |
Partner |
We Preempt |
IMPs |
Imps/Bd |
They Preempt |
Imps |
Imps/Bd |
|
Judith Taylor |
2 |
-2 |
-1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Peter Neville |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Neville |
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
John Glover |
|
|
|
1 |
-3 |
-3 |
|
|
Peter Neville |
|
|
|
1 (2) |
11 (11) |
11 (5.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for 2006 |
|
3 |
-2 |
-0.67 |
4 |
8 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Neville |
|
|
|
1 (3) |
2 (13) |
2 (4.33) |
|
|
Peter Neville |
1 (2) |
0 (0) |
0.00 (0.00) |
|
|
|
|
|
Judith Taylor |
|
|
|
2 (3) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
|
|
Peter Neville |
|
|
|
1 (4) |
8 (21) |
8 (5.25) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for 2007 |
|
1 |
0 |
0.00 |
4 |
10 |
2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Neville |
1 |
0 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for 2012 |
|
1 (3) |
0 (0) |
0.00 (0.00) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
5 |
-2 |
-0.40 |
10 |
10 |
1.00 |
|
Tim’s Statistics MPs |
Top |
Partner |
We Preempt |
MPs |
% |
They Preempt |
MPs |
% |
|
20 |
Peter Neville |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
18 |
45.00 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
18 |
45.00 |
|
Site Map Last Updated 29th May 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Home
Page |
|
||||||
|
2. Newsletters, Photos and Correspondence |
|
|
|||||
|
3. Competitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 Bidding |
|
|
|||||
|
6.1.1 Hand Evaluation |
|
||||||
|
6.1.2 Opening Bids |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
6.1.3 Responding to an Opening Bid |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.1.3.1 Responding to 1NT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1.3.2 Responding to 2NT |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.1.4 Conventions |
|
|
|
||||
|
6.1.4.1 Conventional Opening Bids |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
6.1.4.2 Competitive Conventions |
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
6.1.4.3 Slam Conventions |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.1.5 Doubles |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
6.1.6 The Protective Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 Declarer Play |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2.1 General Technique |
|||||||
|
6.2.2 Trump Management |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 Defence |
|
|
|
||||
|
6.3.1 Defensive Tactics |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
6.3.2 Opening
Leads |
|
|
|
||||
|
6.3.3 Plays in Third Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.3.4 Entry Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 Probability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|