Glenfield
Technical Library
The Change of Suit
Response

Last
Updated on 17th August 2008
In
traditional Acol,
the simple change
of suit response to an opening bid of
one of a suit from a player that has not previously passed is forcing
for one round.
|
In Acol a
change of suit at the one level promises at least six points. You need to discuss with your partner what
a change of suit at the two level shows.
Most modern players play it as promising at least ten points. I still play the old fashioned way and
change the suit at the two level with eight or more points. |
|
|
ª J7 © Q87 ¨ 964 § AKT85 |
After
partner has opened one spade,
this hand from the National
Masters Pairs on 1st March 2003 is worth a bid of two clubs
whichever style is played. Your
problem is more what to do when partner rebids two diamonds. |
|
This difficult decision
occurred in the match between Glenfield A and County C on 5th March 2003 |
|
|
ª 6 © 97542 ¨ AJT § KJ62 |
Partner
opens one
spade. Opponents refuse to help by
staying silent and you have to find a bid on this collection. You are too strong for one no trump and
the singleton spade is less than ideal.
Two clubs is a distortion, but might just be a sensible option at
pairs as it allows you to settle in two diamonds, two hearts, two spades or
three clubs. The “scientific” bid is
two hearts, which, in Acol,
promises a five card suit. When the
hand occurred, two hearts proved to be the winning choice, nine tricks being
just about possible in hearts while seven was the limit in spades which would
have been the final contract had the response been two clubs. One no trump would have worked better than
two clubs; partner would have passed and seven or eight tricks were available
dependent on the play of the diamond suit. |
|
On a good hand there is
a choice between jumping in a new suit or making the simple change of suit
response. I prefer to reserve the jump
bid for balanced hands with 16-18 points or for hands with secondary support
for partner’s suit. |
|
|
ª – © QJT432 ¨ AKQJ42 § 4 |
On
a two suited deal, such as this from the match between Glenfield A and Leicester
Bridge Centre B on 19th March 2003 I would not jump because it
would cramp the bidding too much. If
partner opened
one club I would simply bid one heart.
Then, if partner rebids two
clubs I would continue with a jump to three diamonds. |
|
Statistics at MPs – We change the suit |
Partner |
Hands |
MPs |
Top |
% |
|
Peter
Neville |
7 |
86 |
20 |
61.43 |
|
|
Total |
|
7 |
86 |
20 |
61.43 |
|
Statistics at MPs – They change the suit |
Partner |
Hands |
MPs |
Top |
% |
|
Peter
Neville |
3 |
49 |
20 |
81.67 |
|
|
Total |
|
3 |
49 |
20 |
81.67 |
|
Statistics at IMPs – We change the suit |
Partner |
Hands |
IMPs |
IMPS/Bd |
|
Peter
Neville |
7 |
13 |
1.86 |
|
|
Peter
Neville |
8 (15) |
12 (25) |
1.50 (1.67) |
|
|
John
Glover |
2 |
-1 |
-0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for 2006 |
|
24 |
18 |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter
Neville |
4 (19) |
19 (31) |
4.75 (1.63) |
|
|
Peter
Neville |
3 (22) |
-2 (29) |
-0.67 (1.32) |
|
|
Judith
Taylor |
4 |
-6 |
-1.50 |
|
|
Peter
Neville |
4
(26) |
3 (32) |
0.75 (1.23) |
|
|
Peter
Neville |
2
(28) |
13 (45) |
6.5
(1.61) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for 2007 |
|
17 |
27 |
1.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
42 |
57 |
1.36 |
|
Statistics at IMPs – They change the suit |
Partner |
Hands |
IMPs |
IMPS/Bd |
|
Peter
Neville |
1 |
-8 |
-8.00 |
|
|
Peter
Neville |
2 (3) |
-1 (-9) |
-0.50 (-3.00) |
|
|
Peter
Neville |
4 (7) |
19 (10) |
4.75
(1.43) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for 2006 |
|
7 |
10 |
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter
Neville |
1 (8) |
-2 (8) |
-2.00 (2.00) |
|
|
Judith
Taylor |
3 |
-10 |
-3.33 |
|
|
Peter
Neville |
3 (11) |
8 (16) |
2.67 (1.45) |
|
|
Peter
Neville |
6 (17) |
-10 (-2) |
-1.67 (-0.12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for 2007 |
|
13 |
-14 |
-1.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
20 |
-4 |
-0.2 |
|
Site Map Last Updated 17th August
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Home
Page |
|
||||||
|
2. Newsletters, Photos and Correspondence |
|
|
|||||
|
3. Competitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 Bidding |
|
|
|||||
|
6.1.1 Hand Evaluation |
|
||||||
|
6.1.2 Opening Bids |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
6.1.3 Responding to an Opening Bid |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.1.3.1 Responding to 1NT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1.3.2 Responding to 2NT |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.1.4 Conventions |
|
|
|
||||
|
6.1.4.1 Conventional Opening Bids |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
6.1.4.2 Competitive Conventions |
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
6.1.4.3 Slam Conventions |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.1.5 Doubles |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
6.1.6 The Protective Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 Declarer Play |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2.1 General Technique |
|||||||
|
6.2.2 Trump Management |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 Defence |
|
|
|
||||
|
6.3.1 Defensive Tactics |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
6.3.2 Opening
Leads |
|
|
|
||||
|
6.3.3 Plays in Third Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
6.3.4 Entry Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 Probability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|