The Opening Bid of One of a Suit

 

Last Updated on 17th August 2008

 

 

 

 


With a natural system, based on a weak no trump structure, an opening bid of one of a suit shows about 10-20 points and at least four cards in the suit opened.  In first or second position, it promises a sensible rebid if partner makes a simple change of suit response.

ª A53

© K65

¨ 9

§ AK9852

A single suited hand can plan to rebid the suit.   This hand, from the match between Glenfield A and Leicester Bridge Centre B on 19th March 2003, was worth an opening bid of one club as it could rebid two clubs over any change of suit response.

 

 

With two non-touching four card suits, which is it best to open?

Board 15

Dealer  S

NS Vul

North

 

ª A764

© T8

¨ KQ94

§ AK3

 

North had this problem, after two passes, on this deal from Glenfield Bridge Club on 17th September 2003.  Paul Bowyer would have no problem; his recommendation would be one spade, to make life easy for partner should East overcall.   However, Tim Glover and Peter Neville have fairly comprehensive methods to deal with overcalls in a suit and their style is to open in the lower ranking suit.  They caught a cold on this hand after Peter opened one diamond and East overcalled one no trump.  Tim was fixed.   There were insufficient points to double; bids of two hearts or two spades would be complete guesses so he passed.   West passed and then it was Peter’s turn to be fixed.  Again he has no certain route to steer the partnership into two spades so he passed.  Worse was to come after Tim elected to lead the six of diamonds and Peter later led the ace and king of clubs.  East emerged with an unlikely looking eight tricks to gain a good score for Ray Sherwood and Thomas O’Rourke.  

 

However, even this wasn’t enough for a top.  One South had elected to double one no trump.    They defended slightly better than Tim and Peter but could not prevent East making seven tricks and taking all the match points for David Taylor and Ray LeVesconte.  There was only one other plus score in the East/West column; that went to Mike and Helen Purser who defeated four spades by one trick.  Only three North/South pairs managed to play in the sensible looking spade part score.  Mostly they made nine tricks.  Most pairs chose to defend one no trump but they beat it by one or two tricks after South found a spade lead.   Best North/South score went to Jim Wilde and John Morrey who had the enjoyable experience of defending a three heart contract by West.  They hadn’t doubled, but then they didn’t need to.  They took it four down.

West

 

ª T2

© J543

¨ J73

§ T862

 

East

 

ª QJ8

© AK2

¨ AT85

§ Q75

 

South

 

ª K953

© Q976

¨ 62

§ J94

 

 

 

Paul Bowyer would have had no problem on this hand either.

 

North

 

ª 985432

© 64

¨ T876

§ 9

Board 23

Dealer S

Game All

He would have opened one heart on the South cards.  As did eight of the nine pairs at Glenfield Bridge Club on 19th July 2005.  Seven times out of eight, this was enough to dissuade East/West from bidding three no trumps.  On the eighth occasion, while three no trumps was reached by Mary France & Tom Wright, North led a heart and it was held to ten tricks.

 

At the ninth table, Tim Glover opened one diamond, West bid three no trumps and Peter Neville led a diamond.  The five was played from dummy, giving declarer eleven top tricks (seven clubs, three diamonds and the ace of spades).  In an effort to recover something from the board, Tim bared his king of spades as declarer cashed the first ten tricks but declarer wasn’t fooled and played the ace of spades, felling the king for twelve tricks.  Indeed, all thirteen could have been made but declarer had discarded a spade from dummy.

 

Even 690 wasn’t enough for a top for Watts and Stevens.  John Morrey & Bernard Beauchamp had bid five clubs, been doubled and made eleven tricks.  The other East/West pairs stayed in club part scores making either ten or eleven tricks according to whether they remembered to ruff a diamond or not before drawing trumps.  I think playing for the diamond ruff is better technique than finessing in spades twice, which is a 75% chance.  The diamond ruff will worh whenever diamonds are 4-4  or 5-3 (79.84%) or when diamonds are 6-2 but the hand with the doubleton diamond does not have the jack of clubs (5.45%).  This gives a chance of success of 85.29%.  The chances are further improved by playing one round of trumps before playing on diamonds as the jack of clubs could be singleton.  This increased the total chance of eleven tricks to 87.12%.  Finally, if all else has failed, we can play North for the king of spades,   This will work half, the time, increasing our chances of eleven tricks to 93.56%

West

 

ª 76

© 9

¨ AK9

§ AKQ7632

 

East

 

ª AQT

© JT8752

¨ J5

§ T4

 

South

 

ª KJ

© AKQ3

¨ Q432

§ J85

 

 

 

But would he have fared so well on this deal?

Board 21

Dealer N

Love All

North

 

ª K942

© A6

¨ AQJ7

§ K97

 

The hand comes from Glenfield Bridge Club on 10th January 2007.  The deal was played eight times; seven times the final contract was spades; five times played by West and twice played by North!

 

If North opens one spade, they are likely to play there, giving East/West a score of several hundreds.  The best East/West score went to John Day & Barbara Corlett who took one spade three down.  Then there were two East/West scors of 200; Cynthia & Dave McLoughlin beat one spade by two tricks and the runaway East/West winners, Bill Youngs & John Thomson, took one no trump two down.

 

Your author avoided the problem, on this particular hand, by opening one diamond, and found himself defending one spade and holding it to nine tricks.  This was beaten by the North/South winners, Gordon Musson & Geoff Mead, who got a top on the board, by holding two spades to eight tricks.

The results, travellers and personal scorecards are online.  

 

West

 

ª AQT765

© KQ9

¨ 853

§ J

 

East

 

ª J8

© 7543

¨ KT2

§ AQ84

 

South

 

ª 3

© JT82

¨ 964

§ T6532

 

 

 

With 4-4-4-1 distribution, in a natural system structure,  it is usually correct to open with the suit below the singleton.

ª AKJ7

© Q854

¨ A843

§ 3

The exception is when, as in this deal from the the National Masters Pairs., the singleton is in clubs.  Then it is correct to open one heart.   Those who opened one spade heard partner bid two clubs.   They then have a problem because their rebid is going to promise five spades.   As a consequence they played in four spades on a 4-3 fit, making just nine tricks, while those who opened one heart played in four hearts on a 4-4 fit, making ten tricks. 

 

 

So when is a hand good enough to open?

ª Q43

© AKJ74

¨ 76

§ J72

This is a borderline collection.   Opening this can pay when a fit is found.  However, if there is no fit but partner has about 12 points; you are headed for a substantial minus as occurred when East opened this hand one heart as dealer in the match between Glenfield A and County C on 5th March 2003.

 

 

However, the opening bids vary within the structure of artificial systems.

ª 7

© J74

¨ KT94

§ AKQ54

Playing Precision this hand from the Glenfield Club pairs of 14th May 2003 could  not be opened one club as that would promise sixteen or more points.   Nor could it be opened one heart or one spade as those bids would promise five or more cards in the respective major.   Nor can the hand be opened one no trump as it could hardly be considered balanced.   Instead, it is opened one diamond, a bid that shows opening values that is unsuitable for any other opening bid.

 

 

Precision covers all the hands that Acol takes nine opening bids to describe in just five.  This frees up the opening bids at the two level to convey special meaning.

Board 4

Dealer W

Game All

North

 

ª JT9

© T932

¨ 764

§ 632

 

For example, an opening bid of two diamonds, in traditional Precision, shows 11-15 points and a three suited hand.  It does not specify the three suits.  On this deal, from Glenfield Bridge Club on 25th June 2003, Geoff Mead opened a Precision two diamonds third in hand.

 

Tim Glover was sitting with the massive collection as South and doubled.   This was for takeout.   North/South  would have been in trouble had Dennis Bradley passed for Peter Neville would have had little option but to bid two hearts.  This appears destined to lose two spades, two hearts, a diamond and two clubs for –200; more if doubled.   Dennis let Tim off the hook by bidding two hearts.   This doesn’t show hearts but asks Geoff where his singleton is.   Geoff bid two no trumps to show a singleton heart.   Tim doubled again; this time for penalties.    This was tight, but two no trumps would probably finish one down on a spade lead.

 

However, Dennis removed to three diamonds.  Once more Tim doubled.   With the knowledge of the singleton heart in declarer’s hand Tim can see precisely four defensive tricks; two red aces and two black kings.  That is exactly what he made.  Shortly afterwards Peter was writing –470 on the card.   This might not have been a bottom had some of the East/West pairs matched Tim’s aggressive style of doubling.   One South bid three hearts and finished three down while one North went even further and reached four hearts, failing by four tricks.  Unfortunately for Tim neither contract was doubled.  The most bizarre contract was two hearts by West, which failed by two tricks.   

West

 

ª Q3

© QJ83

¨ KJT9

§ 975

 

East

 

ª A762

© 7

¨ Q832

§ AQJ4

 

South

 

ª K854

© AK64

¨ A5

§ KT8

 

 

 

Blue Club’s openings are canapé: an opening bid may possess a longer suit of lower rank.

Board 5

Dealer N

NS Vul

North

 

ª Q6542

© 84

¨ T85

§ Q83

 

 One advantage of such a method is it is possible to conceal the main attacking strength of the hand when you are out-gunned.  In this deal, from the Derbyshire Green Point Swiss Pairs on 8th July 2006, Tim Glover and Harry Gordon were enticed into bidding three no trumps with the club suit wide open.

 

After two passes, South opened one heart.  Harry doubled, North passed, Tim bid two no trumps and Harry bid the game.

 

South led a small club, won by North’s queen.  The club return allowed South to take the next five tricks for two down and 95% of the match points.

 

Of course, the bidding is much easier against a natural club opening and would lead to the making red suit part-scores.

West

 

ª AKT3

© J6

¨ AJ732

§ J6

 

East

 

ª 98

© KQ973

¨ KQ4

§ T95

 

South

 

ª J7

© AT52

¨ 96

§ AK742

 

 

 

Statistics at MPs – We open 1 of a suit

Partner

Hands

MPs

Top

%

Gimson Final

Peter Neville

15

149

20

49.67

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total for 2006

 

15

149

20

49.67

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gimson Final

Peter Neville

8

67

18/20

44.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total for 2007

 

8

67

18/20

44.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

23

216

 

47.79

 

 

Statistics at MPs – They open 1 of a suit

Partner

Hands

MPs

Top

%

Gimson Final

Peter Neville

9

111

20

61.67

Total

 

9

111

20

61.67

 

 

Statistics at IMPs – We open 1 of a suit

Partner

Hands

IMPs

Imps/Bd

Stanley Trophy 2005/6 - Heat 7

Peter Neville

12

23

1.92

PorterLeicestershire 20 Staffs & Shrops 0

Peter Neville

16 (28)

37 (60)

2.31 (2.14)

PorterLincolnshire 0 Leicestershire 20

Peter Neville

7 (35)

-8 (52)

-1.14 (1.49)

Stanley Trophy 2006/7 - Heat 1

John Glover

5

-24

-4.8

 

 

 

 

 

Total for 2006

 

44

28

0.64

 

 

 

 

 

Glenfield A 4 County A 8

Peter Neville

7 (42)

9 (61)

1.29 (1.45)

Glenfield A 6 Phoenix A 6

Peter Neville

5 (47)

-8 (53)

-1.60 (1.13)

Glenfield A 4 Melton 8

Judith Taylor

8

4

0.50

Glenfield A 9 Loughborough A 3

Peter Neville

8 (55)

3 (56)

0.38 (1.02)

PorterLeicestershire 5 Oxfordshire 15

Peter Neville

10 (65)

23 (79)

2.30 (1.05)

 

 

 

 

 

Total for 2007

 

38

31

0.82

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

72

36

0.50

 

 

Statistics at IMPs – They open 1 of a suit

Partner

Hands

IMPs

Imps/Bd

Stanley Trophy 2005/6 - Heat 7

Peter Neville

1

-8

-8.00

PorterLeicestershire 20 Staffs & Shrops 0

Peter Neville

6 (7)

-6 (-14)

-1.00 (-2.00)

PorterLincolnshire 0 Leicestershire 20

Peter Neville

4 (11)

19 (5)

4.75 (0.45)

Stanley Trophy 2006/7 - Heat 1

John Glover

2

-3

-1.5

 

 

 

 

 

Total for 2006

 

14

-2

-0.14

 

 

 

 

 

Glenfield A 6 Phoenix A 6

Peter Neville

1 (12)

-2 (3)

-2.00 (0.25)

Glenfield A 4 Melton 8

Judith Taylor

5

-14

-2.80

Glenfield A 9 Loughborough A 3

Peter Neville

7 (19)

0 (3)

0.00 (0.16)

PorterLeicestershire 5 Oxfordshire 15

Peter Neville

12 (31)

-22 (-19)

-1.83 (-0.61)

 

 

 

 

 

Total for 2007

 

27

-34

-1.26

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

43

-44

-1.02

 

 

Site Map

Last Updated

17th August 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Home Page

Club News

Glenfield A Fixtures

Glenfield B Fixtures

Forthcoming Events

Links

Master Points

 

2. Newsletters, Photos and Correspondence

Bulletin Board

April 2003

Xmas Tree Competition

Xmas Party

AGM

 

 

3. Competitions

Chairman’s Prize 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Results Archive

Buildrite Cup

Helen Doughty Memorial Trophy

Club Results

A team results

B team results

C team results

D team results

5. Statistics

Statistics Archive

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Technical Library

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.1 Bidding

Strategy

Acol

Psychic Bidding

 Precision

 Blue Club

 

 

6.1.1 Hand Evaluation

Defensive Tricks

Losing Trick Count

Playing Tricks

Point Count

Total Number of Tricks

Passing

 

6.1.2 Opening Bids

One Club

One Diamond

One Heart

One Spade

One No Trump

Pre-empts

 

 

Two Clubs

Two Diamonds

Two Hearts

Two Spades

Two No Trumps

 

 

6.1.3 Responding to an Opening Bid

Simple change of suit

Opener’s Rebid

Responder’s Rebid

Preference

Opener’s Second Rebid

Jump in a new suit

Responding in no trumps

 

Limit Raise

Inverted Minors

 

 

 

 

 

6.1.3.1 Responding to 1NT

Transfers

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.1.3.2 Responding to 2NT

Transfers

Baron

 

 

 

 

 

6.1.4 Conventions

Stayman

Fourth Suit Forcing

Reverse

Crowhurst

 

 

 

6.1.4.1 Conventional Opening Bids

Lucas Twos

Multi Two Diamonds

Weak Twos

 

 

 

 

6.1.4.2 Competitive Conventions

Jump Overcall

Lebensohl

Unassuming Cue Bid

Unusual No Trump

Continuing after opponent’s take out double

Take out Double

Cue Bid

 

Fishbein

Defence to 1NT

Halmic

1NT Overcall

Redouble

Simple Overcall

 

6.1.4.3 Slam Conventions

Blackwood

Gerber

Roman Key Card Blackwood

Splinter

Jump to 5 of a suit

Grand Slam Force

Acol Four No Trump Opening

 

Asking Bids

DOPI and ROPI

 

 

 

 

 

6.1.5 Doubles

Optional

Penalty

 Lead Directional

 

 

 

 

6.1.6 The Protective Position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.2 Declarer Play

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.2.1 General Technique

End Play

Squeeze

Finesse

Lose tricks early

Pin

Avoidance

Restricted Choice

6.2.2 Trump Management

Ruffing

Ruffing Losers before drawing trumps

Trump Coup

Ruffing Finesse

Loser on Loser

Coping with bad splits

Cross Ruff

 

Dummy Reversal

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.3 Defence

Second Player

Signals

Third Player

Play the cards you are known to have

 

 

 

6.3.1 Defensive Tactics

Forcing Defence

Passive Defence

Merrimac Coup

 

 

 

 

6.3.2 Opening Leads

Fourth Highest

Third and Fifth

MUD

Top of Nothing

 

 

 

6.3.3 Plays in Third Hand

Finesse Against Dummy

Finesse Against Partner

 

 

 

 

 

6.3.4 Entry Management

Unblocking

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.4 Probability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.5 Glossary of Terms

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7 Through the Pack